Drawing for ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 86092920

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia L. Werner

PATRICIA L WERNER BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for the recording, collection, retention, storage, analysis, dissemination, and redistribution of voice, fax, video, Internet, data, electronic, and computer transmissions, which transmissions are collected and analyzed for use in the fields of workforce optimization, contact center operations, video analytics, lawful interception, telecommunications, digital and cyber security, and enterprise business intelligence; computer software for monitoring, recording and analyzing personal interactions and communications for the purpose of workforce optimization, enterprise business intelligence and security intelligence; computer software for fraud and identity theft detection, employee training, internet and computer securityACTIVEFeb 28, 2002
042Consulting in the field of computer securityACTIVEFeb 28, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 16, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 16, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 5, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 12, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 8, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 21, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 21, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 21, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 26, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 26, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2014AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2014IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Feb 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 30, 2013AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 30, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 29, 2013EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance