USPTO serial 86092920
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia L. Werner
PATRICIA L WERNER BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for the recording, collection, retention, storage, analysis, dissemination, and redistribution of voice, fax, video, Internet, data, electronic, and computer transmissions, which transmissions are collected and analyzed for use in the fields of workforce optimization, contact center operations, video analytics, lawful interception, telecommunications, digital and cyber security, and enterprise business intelligence; computer software for monitoring, recording and analyzing personal interactions and communications for the purpose of workforce optimization, enterprise business intelligence and security intelligence; computer software for fraud and identity theft detection, employee training, internet and computer security | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2002 |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of computer security | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |