USPTO serial 86108448
FUTURE PROOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE PROOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saskatoon, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Liel Hollander
LIEL HOLLANDER HOLLANDER LAW, P.C.10 BOND ST STE 420GREAT NECK, NY 11021-2409UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring Books, pre-recorded videos, audio programs, e-books, educational literature namely pamphlets, manuals, articles, reports, check sheet systems and educational signage, interior paint, LED bulbs, roofing, windows, electrical control systems for lighting systems, home automation system components namely sensors, programmable logic controllers, actuators and switches for the control of photo voltaic systems, solar thermal air systems, solar thermal water systems, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment; structural and insulation building materials for use in the construction and retrofitting of commercial and residential buildings namely wood structural beams, steel structural beams, concrete structural beams, carbon fiber beams, concrete blocks, insulated concrete blocks, insulated concrete forms, structurally insulated panels, Polystyrene foam sheeting, Polystyrene spray foam, Polyisocyanurate foam sheeting, Polyisocyanurate spray foam, Polyurethane foam sheeting, Polyurethane spray foam, soundproofing foam, aluminum kraft paper, aluminum foil, aluminum siding, concrete insulation, fiberglass insulation, cellulose insulation and mineral rock insulation; software applications for mobile devices namely smart phones, tablets, personal digital assistants, enterprise digital assistants and mobile phones; promotional materials namely tee shirts, jackets, hats, pens, LED bulbs and LED flashlights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |