USPTO serial 86115120
MARTIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARTIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Ackerman
STEPHEN B. ACKERMAN SAILE ACKERMAN LLC28 DAVIS AVEPOUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603-2408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Devices for hands-free use of mobile phones; Wireless communication devices for voice, data or image transmission; Input devices for phones having short-distance wireless communication technology, with capabilities for voice command for calls, text, search and find, for voice commands for mobile applications on smartphones, and for messages, incoming text, emails, reminders and social web page notifications. Watches for use with mobile telephones, namely, watches that utilize short-distance wireless communication technology to connect wirelessly to mobile telephones so the user can control the phone by voice, receive incoming calls, SMS, social media, email notifications and other information from the phone, interact with mobile phone applications, and place and receive phone calls hands-free; Sport watches for use with mobile telephones, namely, watches that utilize short-distance wireless communication technology to connect wirelessly to mobile telephones so the user can control the phone by voice, receive incoming calls, SMS, social media, email notifications and other information from the phone, interact with mobile phone applications, and place and receive phone calls hands-free; Watches that utilize short-distance wireless communication technology to connect wirelessly to mobile telephones so the user can control the phone by voice, receive incoming calls, SMS, social media, email notifications and other information from the phone, interact with mobile phone applications, and place and receive phone calls hands-free; Watches with wireless communication capabilities; watches having mechanical, electronic and automatic quartz parts and modules, integrated with speakers, microphone, vibration motor, display and sensors; Chronographs for use as watches; Chronometric instruments and watch movements; Clocks and watches; Dress watches; Designer watches; Watches as wrist-wear accessories; Wrist watches; Watches containing an electronic game function; Watches for outdoor use; Watches for sporting use; Watches made of precious metals or coated therewith | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |