USPTO serial 86119099
PRO CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Québec (Québec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
GEORGE A. PELLETIER, JR. CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1253UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Conveyors | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Cooking and stainless steel refrigeration installations for commercial use only, namely, refrigerated merchandise display cases, refrigerated merchandise displays cases for cafeterias, refrigerated wall cabinets, refrigerated counters for garnishes, refrigerators for beer, refrigerators for sodas, freezers for ice cream and other foodstuffs, refrigerated work tables, refrigerated tables for pizza; steaming trolleys being heated mobile units for the storage and delivery of food products; electric heating plates being electric hot plates, hot tables being bain-marie units, heating kitchen cabinets, air ovens, hot plates for soup, hot plates with drawers, heating wells with drain; kitchen racks; kitchen sinks for washing dishes and crockery, cooker hoods being ventilation hoods, sinks, sinks for bars, sinks for cooking pots, mobile sinks, sanitary sinks, sinks for prewash; filters for drippings, cooker hoods being ventilation hoods; platforms, electric or gas broilers for the chicken and other meat, electric smokehouse being barbecue smokers for meat and fish | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Corner trolleys, universal adjustable corner trolleys, trolleys for trays and cutlery, trolleys, platforms being trolleys, utility carts, trolleys for dishes and crockery | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Pastry tables, sandwich tables, work tables; fixed and mobile shelves; mobile isolated cabinets, sports bar units being furniture used for the preparation of cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Urns for hot water; mobile bread bins; wooden or hard plastic boards to cut, namely, carving boards and cutting boards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Julien Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named PRO CHEF
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |