USPTO serial 86135797
BLUE LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Blank, Esq.
RICHARD M. BLANK, ESQ. RICHARD M. BLANK, ESQ.19 LEDGEWOOD COMMONSMILLWOOD, NY 10546-1026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beverages; beverage cans; beverage containers; heated beverage containers; electric beverage containers; plastic beverage containers; metal beverage containers; beverage glassware; beverage stirrers; beverage lids; insulated beverage containers; beverage coolers; portable beverage coolers; beverage container holder; dairy-based beverages; fruit-based beverages; milk-based beverages; dairy beverages; fruit beverages; milk beverages; peanut-based beverages; vegetable-based beverages; yogurt-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; cocoa-based beverages; grain-based beverages; oat-based beverages; herbal food beverages; coconut-based beverages; beverages made of coffee; beverages made of tea; prepared beverages; aloe juice beverages; carbonated beverages; frozen carbonated beverages; fruit-flavored beverages; iced fruit beverages; non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; non-alcoholic malt beverage; non-carbonated, non-alcoholic frozen flavored beverages; sherbet beverages; tomato juice; vegetable juice; fruit juice; water beverages; whey beverages; alcoholic beverages; alcoholic beverages with fruit; wine; wine-based beverages; spirit beverages; liquor beverages; wines; sparkling wines; prepared alcoholic beverages; frozen alcoholic beverages; wine-based beverages; prepared alcoholic cocktails; mixed drinks; alcoholic cocktail mixes; alcoholic carbonated beverages; drinks; soft drinks; sports drinks; vegetable drinks; espresso drinks, ice cream drinks; aloe vera drinks; cola drinks; energy drinks; fruit drinks; fruit flavored drinks; fruit flavored soft drinks; fruit flavored carbonated drinks; non-alcoholic drinks; alcoholic drinks; alcoholic energy drinks; wine coolers; alcoholic fruit cocktail drinks; wine-based drinks; caffeinated soft drinks; caffeinated sodas; caffeinated carbonated beverages; energy soft drinks; energy sodas; energy carbonated beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |