USPTO serial 86139216
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth W. King
GREGORY L MAAG CONLEY ROSE PCPO BOX 3267HOUSTON, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal elbows for pipes; Metal building materials, namely, t-sections and elbows | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 007 | Parts for machines, namely, valves; Machines, namely, crusher teeth; Parts for machines, namely, valves, elbows, pumps, t-sections, furnace bends, furnace caps and coker nozzles; Pneumatic actuator package consisting of pneumatic actuator, limit switch, solenoid, filter/regulator, mounting kit and valve; Parts for machines, namely isolation ball valves | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 009 | Electric, automated, and automatic valves for industrial use for controlling the direction of flow of liquids and gases; Automated valves for flow systems having entrained particulates; Electric, automated and automatic valves for industrial use that may have handles for emergency operation for shutting down systems, and controlling the direction and intensity of flow of liquids and gases, or shutting down the flow of liquids or gases; Automatic valves; Automatic valves for industrial use, electric valves, and computer controlled industrial valves in the nature of automated valves for industrial use for energy systems, namely, power plants, nuclear generation plants, oil and gas wells and facilities, and other plants and facilities, namely, pulp and paper plants, mining facilities, mineral plants and facilities, and for use in process industries, aerospace industry, and petrochemical industry; Automatic valves for general industrial use; Controlled volume pumps; Automatic industrial valves; Electric valves; Computer controlled industrial valves in the nature of automated valves for industrial use for energy systems, namely, power plants, nuclear generation plants, oil and gas wells and facilities, and other plants and facilities, namely, pulp and paper plants, mining facilities, mineral plants and facilities, and for use in process industries, aerospace industry, and petrochemical industry | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 011 | Steam valves | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and/or repair of valves in industrial plants, namely, evaluating and maintaining the valve population in a client's industrial plant, by repairing or replacing valves as necessary; Application of hardfacing welded overlay protective coatings | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1987 |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, evaluating the valves in the industrial plants and businesses of others | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |