Drawing for VALVTECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 86139216

VALVTECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALVTECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth W. King

GREGORY L MAAG CONLEY ROSE PCPO BOX 3267HOUSTON, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal elbows for pipes; Metal building materials, namely, t-sections and elbowsACTIVEDec 31, 1987
007Parts for machines, namely, valves; Machines, namely, crusher teeth; Parts for machines, namely, valves, elbows, pumps, t-sections, furnace bends, furnace caps and coker nozzles; Pneumatic actuator package consisting of pneumatic actuator, limit switch, solenoid, filter/regulator, mounting kit and valve; Parts for machines, namely isolation ball valvesACTIVEDec 31, 1987
009Electric, automated, and automatic valves for industrial use for controlling the direction of flow of liquids and gases; Automated valves for flow systems having entrained particulates; Electric, automated and automatic valves for industrial use that may have handles for emergency operation for shutting down systems, and controlling the direction and intensity of flow of liquids and gases, or shutting down the flow of liquids or gases; Automatic valves; Automatic valves for industrial use, electric valves, and computer controlled industrial valves in the nature of automated valves for industrial use for energy systems, namely, power plants, nuclear generation plants, oil and gas wells and facilities, and other plants and facilities, namely, pulp and paper plants, mining facilities, mineral plants and facilities, and for use in process industries, aerospace industry, and petrochemical industry; Automatic valves for general industrial use; Controlled volume pumps; Automatic industrial valves; Electric valves; Computer controlled industrial valves in the nature of automated valves for industrial use for energy systems, namely, power plants, nuclear generation plants, oil and gas wells and facilities, and other plants and facilities, namely, pulp and paper plants, mining facilities, mineral plants and facilities, and for use in process industries, aerospace industry, and petrochemical industryACTIVEDec 31, 1987
011Steam valvesACTIVEDec 31, 1987
037Installation, maintenance and/or repair of valves in industrial plants, namely, evaluating and maintaining the valve population in a client's industrial plant, by repairing or replacing valves as necessary; Application of hardfacing welded overlay protective coatingsACTIVEDec 31, 1987
042Technical support services, namely, evaluating the valves in the industrial plants and businesses of othersACTIVEDec 31, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 10, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 10, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 17, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Dec 4, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 4, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 4, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 30, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 12, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 12, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 12, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 12, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 12, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Dec 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 13, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance