USPTO serial 86146645
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
REDWOOD CITY, CA
Ann Arbor, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Falkowski
ANNE M ROGASKI1301 SHOREWAY ROADSUITE 275BELMONT, CA 94002| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio headphones; Computer screens; Earphones; Eyewear in the nature of an electronic computer display worn on the head in the same way as eyeglasses; Head-mounted video displays; Headphones; Headsets for use with computers; Music headphones; Personal headphones for sound transmitting apparatuses; Personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systems; Stereo headphones | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Game controllers for computer games; Player-operated electronic controllers for electronic video game machines; Video game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |