Drawing for GLYPH

USPTO serial 86146645

GLYPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLYPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Falkowski

ANNE M ROGASKI1301 SHOREWAY ROADSUITE 275BELMONT, CA 94002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio headphones; Computer screens; Earphones; Eyewear in the nature of an electronic computer display worn on the head in the same way as eyeglasses; Head-mounted video displays; Headphones; Headsets for use with computers; Music headphones; Personal headphones for sound transmitting apparatuses; Personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systems; Stereo headphonesACTIVE
028Game controllers for computer games; Player-operated electronic controllers for electronic video game machines; Video game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitorACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 8, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 8, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 8, 2016EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Jul 26, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Jul 13, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 5, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
May 18, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 3, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 28, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 28, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 27, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 2, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 2, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 1, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 1, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 6, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 20, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance