USPTO serial 86147378
SLUDGE REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES, A UNIT OF ENVIROSYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5273583Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SLUDGE REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES, A UNIT OF ENVIROSYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CA
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CA
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036-3006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | industrial de-inventorying services for tanks, namely, the process of extracting sludge, sediment, semi-solids and waste materials from tanks while tank remains in service | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Envirosystems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Envirosystems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Envirosystems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SLUDGE REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES, A UNIT OF ENVIROSYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |