Drawing for CAT-A-LIFT WHEN A CRANE WON'T DO

USPTO serial 86147410

CAT-A-LIFT WHEN A CRANE WON'T DO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAT-A-LIFT WHEN A CRANE WON'T DO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Hall

LORI HALL GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPONE MAIN STREET WESTHAMILTON, ONTARIO, L8P4Z5CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Catalyst handling process, namely, machines for conveying solidsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 15, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 14, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 23, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 14, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 25, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 7, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Jan 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance