USPTO serial 86170927
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Richmond, VA
Richmond, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian D. Titley
IAN D TITLEY SCHRODER FIDLOW PLC1901 E FRANKLIN STSTE 107RICHMOND, VA 23223-6966| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chemical flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarettes, electronic cigars, electronic smoking pipes, electronic hookahs, smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes, and personal smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes; Cartridges sold filled containing chemical flavorings in liquid form for use with electronic cigarettes, electronic cigars, electronic smoking pipes, electronic hookahs, smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes, and personal smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes | ABANDONED | — |
| 034 | Electronic cigarettes, electronic cigars, electronic smoking pipes, electronic hookahs, smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes, and personal smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes; Cartomizers, namely, electronic refill cartridges sold empty for electronic cigarettes, electronic cigars, electronic smoking pipes, electronic hookahs, smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes, and personal smokeless electronic cigarette vaporizer pipes; Replacement parts for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |