USPTO serial 86174087
TV WEEKLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TV WEEKLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie A. Greenberg
JULIE A GREENBERG GIFFORD KRASS SPRINKLE ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI PC2701 TROY CENTER DRIVE SUITE 330PO BOX 7021TROY, MI 48007-7021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, printed magazines, newspaper inserts, television guides, featuring information pertaining to media, television, movies, stars, trivia, gossip, media programming guides with information relating to video and audio content in television, movies, the Internet, web podcasts and radio programming, games, and puzzles | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2010 |
| 041 | Online publications, namely, online articles, guides, magazines relating to media, television, movies, stars, trivia, games, puzzles, gossip, media programming guides with information relating to video and audio content in television, the Internet, web podcasts and radio programming | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |