USPTO serial 86185563
SAFESEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRINGER, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFESEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas Q. Hahn
DOUGLAS Q HAHN STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH660 NEWPORT CENTER DR STE 1600NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6422UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a non-downloadable computer software for use in secure document exchange and management to allow users to securely collaborate, manage and track business content and communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 19, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |