USPTO serial 86198999
CORVIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABLE, ERIC
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORVIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coquitlam, BC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Catheters and cannulas for medical purposes; Drainage apparatus and instruments for surgical procedures; Medical apparatus and instruments for surgical procedures; Medical apparatus and instruments for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery; Medical apparatus and instruments for treating congestive heart failure; Medical apparatus and instruments for preventing or reversing heart failure; Medical apparatus and instruments for recording heart activity; Medical apparatus and instruments for treating cardiovascular disease; Medical apparatus and instruments for cardiovascular diagnostics; Medical apparatus and instruments to measure blood pressure, cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |