USPTO serial 86199370
EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. McHattie, Esq.
CLAY D SHORROCK THE MCHATTIE LAW FIRM LLC550 WEST MAIN STREETBOONTON, NJ 07005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, hats and caps; Collared shirts; Golf shirts; Graphic T-shirts; Hooded sweat shirts; Long-sleeved shirts; Shirts for infants, toddlers, children, adults, men and women | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |