USPTO serial 86201819
BANANNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BANANNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game cartridges, computer game cassettes, and computer game tapes, video game cartridges, video game cassettes, pre-recorded computer software programs featuring music and motion picture sound tracks, interactive multimedia software programs containing motion pictures for entertainment, interactive multi-media software for playing games; interactive entertainment software and accompanying instruction manuals sold as a unit, namely, computer game software and manuals sold as a unit, video game software and manuals sold as a unit; pre-recorded audio discs, compact discs, DVDs, digital versatile discs, digital video discs featuring music, animation, animated motion pictures, soundtracks, games and stories; pre-recorded CD-ROMs and DVDs featuring games, films, music, computer game software, and video game software; downloadable video game software and downloadable computer game software, e-books featuring fictional stories recorded on computer media; cases for mobile telephones, laptop bags, smart phone bags; refrigerator magnets; sunglasses; eyewear frames; children's helmets, namely, bike, ski, snowboard and skating helmets | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Electronics robotics hand held unit for playing electronic games; interactive video games; hand-held unit for playing electronic games; action figures, bathtub toys, kites, toy building blocks, toy action figures; inflatable toys, toy bucket and shovel sets; toy mobiles; crib mobiles, crib toys, toy vehicles; toy scooters; toy cars; toy model kits; toy figures; toy banks; toy trucks; toy watches; water squirting toys; wind-up toys; children's multiple activity toys, squeeze toys; teddy bears, die cast miniature toy vehicles, bean bag dolls; dolls, doll accessories, doll clothing, play sets for action figures, bendable action figures, flying discs, inflatable vinyl action figures, jigsaw puzzles, marbles, party favors in the nature of small toys, paper party hats, plush toys, puppets, ride-on toys, mechanical toys; music box toys; musical toys; plush toys; punching balls; puppets; snow globes; party balloons, toy banks, water squirting toys, stuffed toys, bath toys, holiday ornaments, christmas stockings; christmas decorations, artificial garlands and ornaments; and model craft kits of toy action figures; collectable toy figures; toy mobiles; disc toss toys; electric action toys; collectable toy figures; fishing tackle; golf balls; golf gloves; golf ball markers; tennis tables; tennis balls; badminton sets, bowling balls, baseballs, baseball bats, catcher's mitts, basketballs, soccer balls; target games, hockey pucks; jigsaw puzzles; jump ropes; magic card tricks; marbles; action skill games, manipulative games, namely, action target games, party games, board games, chess sets; dartboards, dart games, backgammon games, checkers, card games, playing cards, parlor games, arcade games; rubber balls; beach balls; bean bags; toy building blocks; roller skates; skateboards; snowboards; pinball machines, spinning tops; return spinning tops, disc toss toys, bubble making wands and solution sets; toy scooters; ninja accessory kits, namely, baton, club, and toy that simulates a hologram apparatus; stacking toys, namely, stacking cups; play tents; costumes and masks; pet accessories, namely, pet toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | animated motion picture film production and distribution | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Redrover Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Redrover Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BANANNY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |