Drawing for ENGAGEMD

USPTO serial 86208282

ENGAGEMD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGAGEMD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phi Lan Tinsley

Phi Lan Tinsley K&L Gates LLPOne Lincoln StreetBoston, MA 02111-2950UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing pricing and billing information about the medical services of others via a global computer network; marketing the on-line databases of othersACTIVE—
036Bill-payment services offered to medical-service providersACTIVE—
038Educational electronic-mail and text-messaging services for transmission of educational content via SMS; telecommunication services, namely, providing electronic message alerts via the internetACTIVE—
042Computer consultation in the nature of installing software to implement those improvements in the fields of website optimization and big data capture, storage, searching, sharing, transferring, analysis and visualization; computer services, namely, computer consultation in the nature of analyzing efficiency, identifying potential improvements, and writing and installing software to implement those improvements in the field of website optimizationACTIVE—
044Remote monitoring of data indicative of the health or condition of an individual or group of individuals for medical diagnosis and treatment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 6, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2015INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jul 24, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance