Drawing for PURVEYOR

USPTO serial 86235969

PURVEYOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PURVEYOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil R. Ormos

Neil R. Ormos Patti & Malvone Law Group, LLC1 N LASALLE ST FL 44CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Airship mooring mast system, namely, metal mooring masts and mechanisms, namely, cables and mechanical joints and clamps on mast to latch airship thereto; mechanical latching mechanisms made of metal for monitoring and stabilizing airship cargo; airship components, namely, mechanical mechanisms made of metal for pressurizing the envelope, monitoring the pressure, and detecting leaks; airship components, namely, water transfer systems namely, ducts composed of e-glass, engine exhaust bypass valves composed of metal, heat exchanger composed of metal, and metal holding tanks for engine exhaust water vapor recoveryACTIVE
007Airship components, namely, fans, valvesACTIVE
009Airship cargo loadmaster stations, namely, electronic control circuits, electronic apparatus for the remote control of airship cargo loadmaster operations, electronic, remote controlled, and magnetic position sensors, cameras, and electronic visual displays for use by loadmasters for cargo control and monitoring; airship cargo monitoring systems, namely, electronic control circuits, electronic apparatus for the remote control of airship cargo monitoring systems, electronic, remote controlled, and magnetic position sensors, cameras, and electronic visual displays; airship control systems, namely, computers, electronic, electromechanical, digital, and fiber optic sensors, electronic and electromechanical actuators, remote controls, and autonomous control software for managing control of the airship during unmanned flight, managing control of the airship, and automatically controlling or maintaining heading, altitude, or attitude; computer hardware, software, and peripherals for managing control devices, namely, onboard electronic devices for flight control for aircraft; laser measuring systems; airship components, namely, electronic, electromechanical, remote controlled, digital, magnetic, and fiber optic sensors for pressurizing the envelope, monitoring the pressure, and detecting leaks; airship components, namely, electronic, electromechanical, remote, and digital control circuits for monitoring and stabilizing airship cargo; cameras for monitoring and stabilizing airship cargo; and electronic visual displays in the nature of electronic display interfaces for monitoring and stabilizing airship cargoACTIVE
012Airships; airship buoyancy control and management systems comprising tanks in the nature of airship ballast tanks, valves in the nature of self-regulating gas valves, and piping in the nature of ducting; airship components, namely, mooring latching mechanisms, namely, structural parts in the nature of cables and mechanical joints and clamps to latch airship to mooring mastsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2015UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Sep 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 8, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 26, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 14, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 13, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 13, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 15, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 15, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 26, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 1, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance