USPTO serial 86258328
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
South Jordan, UT
South Jordan, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Jeppsen
DANIEL K BROUGH BENNETT TUELLER JOHNSON & DEERE3165 E MILLROCK DR STE 500SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing specialized facilities for business meetings, business receptions, and networking events; providing facilities for trade exhibitions | ABANDONED | Oct 28, 2008 |
| 043 | Providing general purpose facilities for fairs and exhibitions; rental of banquet and social function facilities for special occasions, namely, weddings, wedding receptions, rehearsal dinners, bar mitzvahs, bat mitzvahs, birthday parties, social receptions and events, anniversary parties, fundraising events, business receptions, political events and rallies, quinceañeras, wakes, memorial services, funeral services, trade shows, bachelor parties, bachelorette parties, fashion shows, networking events, training seminars conventions, conferences, and social meetings | ABANDONED | Sep 25, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |