Drawing for NLIVEN

USPTO serial 86274920

NLIVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSEN, AMANDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NLIVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an Internet website portal featuring links to purchase tickets for entertainment, art, sports, and special eventsACTIVEDec 1, 2015
038Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of wireless communication networks to enable users to purchase tickets for entertainment, art, sports, and special eventsACTIVEDec 1, 2015
042Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in purchasing tickets for entertainment, art, sports, and special eventsACTIVEDec 1, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 22, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 18, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 18, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 15, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 11, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 3, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 3, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 14, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 27, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 10, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 24, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 22, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 9, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 21, 2014MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
May 20, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 10, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance