USPTO serial 86279971
TREMSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TREMSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Rooftop fall protection safety equipment made primarily of metal, namely, non-penetrating rails, fixed rails, skylight rails, skylight screens, hatch rails, portable free standing roof edge rails and free standing warning lines; non-rooftop rails made primarily of metal, namely, access rails, stairway rails used inside and outside of buildings, rails to separate work areas from public walkway areas; non-rolling and portable walkways of metal for construction purposes; ladder decks of metal; toe boards of metal; automated self-closing security gates made of metal or predominantly metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Fall protection equipment, namely, safety line systems comprising lines, base weights, pedestals and portable and fixed anchors and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; safety harnesses for persons working at heights to prevent falls | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of new and existing rooftop fall protection safety equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing safety seminars and safety training classes with respect to rooftop fall protection safety equipment and with respect to project, operational and maintenance safety | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development and establishment of testing specifications and procedures in the field of project, operational and maintenance safety; inspection and testing services of new and existing safety equipment, namely, project, operational, maintenance and fall protection safety equipment; safety hazard inspection and reporting services; development and implementation of safety procedures and safety programs, namely, policies and initiatives in the field of project, operational and maintenance safety | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tremco Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Tremco Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TREMSAFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |