Drawing for CLICKS

USPTO serial 86283711

CLICKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLICKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phillip Thomas Horton

736 WEST STATE STREETFARMINGTON, UT 84025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring clothing and apparelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 1, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 10, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 12, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 7, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 7, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 15, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 9, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 9, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance