Drawing for CONTENT CLOUD

USPTO serial 86292266

CONTENT CLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTENT CLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Costellia

JEFFREY L COSTELLIA NIXON PEABODY LLP799 9TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services; marketing services; public relation services; publicity services; promotional services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; electronic advertising services; organization of events, exhibitions, fairs and shows for commercial, promotional and advertising purposes; distribution and dissemination of advertising materials; information, advisory consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services, including such services provided online from a computer database or via the internetACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 16, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 16, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 16, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 4, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 2, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 26, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
May 26, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
May 26, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 23, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 23, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 22, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 22, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 4, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 3, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 3, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 3, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 9, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 30, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance