USPTO serial 86304263
EYEOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYEOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidman
MARK TIDMAN BAKER & HOSTETLER1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and electronic systems; Computer software and hardware used in, and for use in the design and development of, computing devices, computer hardware, semiconductor intellectual property (sip) cores, microprocessor cores, silicon chips, microcontroller cores, semiconductors, integrated circuits, circuit chips, macro cells and code, and application software and operating system software; SIP cores, microprocessor cores, microcontroller cores, and macro cells; Instruction set architectures and processor architecture; ROM monitor software, libraries, debuggers, encoders, decoders, device drivers, firmware; Parts and fittings of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and development of computer hardware and software for others, in particular for the optimisation of apparatus for recording, transmitting or reproducing of sound, video or imaging data; Design and development of data encryption, decoding services and optimisation of storage use in electronic systems; Engineering services relating to data processing technology; Design and development hardware and software for others for data preparation and data processing in computer chips, integrated circuits, semiconductors, silicon chips, semiconductors intellectual property (sip) cores, printed circuit boards and electronic systems; Providing access to non-downloadable software to others to enable improved performance in the streaming, sharing, uploading, downloading, transmission or reproduction of sound, video or imaging data and information via the Internet and communications networks; Computer specification design services; Information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |