CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SUPER 88

USPTO serial 86310107

SUPER 88

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SUPER 88?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTIANNE NABONG

KRISTIANNE NABONG SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORPORATION3401 N. CALIFORNIACHICAGO, IL 60618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Slot machines; gambling machines; electronic gaming machines; replacement parts for all of the foregoingACTIVESep 28, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 30, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 15, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 15, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 10, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 19, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 23, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance