Drawing for Serial No. 86316207

USPTO serial 86316207

Serial No. 86316207

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAVOIE, RYAN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86316207?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Solomon

DONNA M KLETT PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed paper labels; paper identification tags; printed paper labels; adhesive labels; paper die cut shapes; paper labels; paper tags; placards of paper or cardboard; printed paper labels; couponsACTIVENov 21, 2014
020Plastic labelsACTIVEJan 15, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 25, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 25, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 9, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 17, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
May 17, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
May 17, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 20, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 12, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 12, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 11, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 11, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2016AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED
Feb 4, 2016IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jan 14, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 12, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Apr 2, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Apr 2, 2015EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY
Apr 2, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 12, 2015AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 12, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2015EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 1, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jun 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 24, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance