USPTO serial 86316349
SMARTCITY BY ADVENTOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4788592Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2015
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTCITY BY ADVENTOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
Greenwood Village, CO
Greenwood Village, CO
Greenwood Village, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Horace
Stephen J. Horace Michael Best & Friedrich LLP1776 Lincoln Street, Suite 1100Denver, CO 80203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for use by state and local governments for improving operating efficiency, management and communications, namely, software for integrating and coordinating data from the government and the community served by enabling diverse communications and database systems to work together; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local governments that enables information sharing between departments or between government agencies and the community served via electronic forms, electronic documents, calendars, discussions, community requests and applications to promote efficiency and reduce costs; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local governments that improves customer service response time and improves communication and collaboration by providing instant access to current information from a single source; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local governments that improves efficiency, namely, software for tracking, searching, and reporting of information and data in the areas of business services, finance and budget, human resources and personnel operations, and information technology, manage policies and procedures, capture document sign-offs and compliance, provide secure access to the local governments and the community served for the collection of property tax, utility billing, job costing, payroll, general accounting, business reporting, work flow processing, document management, management of public works, assets and land management, licensing, citizen complaints, property inspections, and other state and local government issues; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local government that automates state and local government-wide departmental communications and service data collection services for purposes of facilitating decision processing; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local government that automates data warehousing; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local government that automates the electronic completion of forms via secure intranets, extranets and/or public facing computer networks; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local government that integrates project management, collaboration and reporting software tools into a real-time shared resource for improving and facilitating group project performance; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local government that manages and securely shares computerized data, namely, human resources and training records; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for use by state and local government that permits secure access to selected governmental intranet information by external partners and constituents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVENTOS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Adventos LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Adventos LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Adventos LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMARTCITY BY ADVENTOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |