Drawing for PREDICTIVF

USPTO serial 86323280

PREDICTIVF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREDICTIVF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. McCormack

JOHN M. MCCORMACK KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL STREETSUITE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1324

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044medical clinical services and medical online services for assessment of a subject for an in vitro fertilization treatment cycle, including determining probability of a live birth eventACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 17, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 17, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 6, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 12, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 12, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 17, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 17, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 8, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance