USPTO serial 86324790
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J. RIEBLING Riebling IP, PLLC1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 1025WASHINGTON, DC 20006-3951| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting public awareness and research findings in the fields of health care, the medical benefits and safe use of cannabis, and the laws and regulations related to medical cannabis, and distribution of information and materials related thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 2015 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |