USPTO serial 86331129
BABY-SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY-SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela Kalsi
Angela Kalsi IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Rd., Suite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | All-purpose cleaners; all-purpose household cleaning preparations; glass and surface cleaning preparations; bathtub and tile cleaning preparations; floor cleaning preparations; cleaners for use on hard surfaces; biotechnological chemical and spray cleaners for industrial and household applications such as stain removal, odor elimination, and bioremediation of many types of organic and hydrocarbon-based materials; biotechnological cleaning solution for eliminating odors, breaking down organics, and removing stains; stain removers; preparations to clean dishes and bottles; dish detergent; dishwasher detergent; hand soaps; baby soap; antibacterial soap; liquid soap; body and beauty care cosmetics; laundry detergent; anti-static dryer sheets; preparations to remove stains; scented room sprays; baby oil; baby powders; baby wipes; disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for use on the face; non-medicated diaper rash creams; body wash preparations; hair care preparations; shampoos; hair conditioners; body wash; non-medicated bubble bath preparations; bath foam; lip balms and non-medicated face balms; skin moisturizing lotions; non-medicated ointments, creams and lotions for the body, face and hands; toothpaste; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin ointments to promote healing; sunscreen creams and sun block preparations; non-mediated ointments for prevention and treatment of sunburn; sunscreen sticks and sprays | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Hand sanitizing preparations; hand sanitizing wipes; medicated sunscreen and sunblock preparations; medicated sunscreen sticks; medicated body-wash preparations; cleaning preparations, namely, odor eliminators not for personal use; odor neutralizing preparations for general use on various surfaces; air deodorizing preparations for rooms; medicated diaper rash creams; saline nasal sprays; decongestant nasal sprays; nose drops; anti-insect spray; bug repellent; anti-inflammatory teething gels; anti-inflammatory ointments; herbal topical creams, gels, salves, sprays, powder, balms, liniment and ointments for the relief of aches and pain; Menthol vapor bath preparations for babies; medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations, namely, preparations for the relief of cough, cold, and flu symptoms; sanitizing wipes; babies' diapers of paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 19, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |