Drawing for CONNECTIVE DIGITAL EXPERIENCE

USPTO serial 86337292

CONNECTIVE DIGITAL EXPERIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONNECTIVE DIGITAL EXPERIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra Nicholson, Esq.

ALEXANDRA NICHOLSON, ESQ. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1251 Avenue of the Americas, 21st FloorNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation services relating to conceiving, planning and executing online digital experiences for third parties; Business strategy development services relating to digital experience; Business consultation services relating to digital experience strategy consulting; Business consultation services relating to digital design consulting; Business consultation services in the field of customer experience management; providing business intelligence services; Business consultation services relating to digital experience technology platform implementation and measurement and optimization servicesACTIVE
041Educational services, namely, workshops, courses and training programs in the field of organizational development and enablement strategy specific to maximizing digital capabilities within client organizations; Educational services, namely, workshops, courses and training programs in the field of digital experience development, digital experience strategy, experience design and technology, and digital experience measurement and optimizationACTIVE
042Website and software application design and development services; Mobile application design and development services; Computer services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on Internet traffic and providing control and content control of the websites of others; Planning, design, development and maintenance of computer applications and websites for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 23, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 18, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 16, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 10, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 8, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 8, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 8, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 18, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance