Drawing for BABELITE

USPTO serial 86342288

BABELITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BABELITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Baby food; Baby foods; Food for babies; Food for infants; Infant formulaACTIVEJul 12, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2017UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Jun 26, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 20, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 16, 2016UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Dec 15, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 15, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 15, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2016UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Jun 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 3, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2015UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Oct 26, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 30, 2015UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN
Aug 29, 2015INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST
Aug 14, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 12, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 12, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 4, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 3, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 26, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Jul 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance