USPTO serial 86346455
SCADA AS A SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCADA AS A SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathy Tsai
MICHELLE LEE FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of oilfield automation systems; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for oilfield automation; Computer systems integration services; Design and development of wireless communication systems for transmission and reception of voice, data and video; Monitoring remote devices, namely, sensors, gauges, and cameras to ensure proper functioning | ACTIVE | Feb 19, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |