USPTO serial 86350987
INTELLIRESULT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIRESULT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A. LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.1600 JFK BLVD FL 2PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the digital display and analysis of data and business metrics, namely, computer software for business intelligence, data mining, building charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer software for training users on the functionality of computer software for the digital display and analysis of business intelligence, user data and business metrics, namely, computer software for training users on data mining and how to integrate user data into charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Customized computer training services on the use of computer software for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer training services in the field of computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; developing custom-built computer software for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer consulting services for the digital display and analysis of user data and business metrics, namely, business intelligence, data analysis, data mining, charts, graphs, diagrams, maps, dashboards, scorecards and reporting; computer consulting services in the field of computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms; design of computer software for business intelligence, data warehousing, data processing, and data transforms; computer software design; computer software project management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |