Drawing for SUGAR SHACK

USPTO serial 86362741

SUGAR SHACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SABLE, ERIC
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUGAR SHACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia M Bishop

JULIA M BISHOP TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTRESS STREET NEATLANTA, GA 30308-2216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Donuts; Doughnut holes; DoughnutsACTIVENov 24, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 31, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 31, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 15, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 5, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 8, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 8, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance