Drawing for EVERYDAY FASHION FOR FOOD

USPTO serial 86373081

EVERYDAY FASHION FOR FOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERYDAY FASHION FOR FOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven L. Baron

Steven L. Baron Mandell Menkes LLCOne North Franklin StreetSuite 3600Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Plastic containers for household use; Household containers for food; Disposable cooking skewers made of plastic, wood and bamboo; Disposable meal trays, bowls, plates, cups and lunch boxes made of wood, bamboo and plastic; Servingware for serving food; Dinnerware, namely, plates, bowls, cups and glasses; Drinking strawsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Dec 13, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 12, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 20, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 20, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 12, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 12, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 25, 2014LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Sep 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance