USPTO serial 86376781
UPRISE.FM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UPRISE.FM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick Pinto
99 PRINCE STREETSUITE 701MONTREAL, QC H3C 2M7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Transmission services via the Internet, featuring MP3 files and music videos; Video streaming services via the Internet, featuring independent films and movies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |