Drawing for DEBORAH KING'S LIFEFORCE ENERGY HEALING

USPTO serial 86377296

DEBORAH KING'S LIFEFORCE ENERGY HEALING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SERVANCE, RENEE L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEBORAH KING'S LIFEFORCE ENERGY HEALING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ted Gerdes

TED GERDES GERDES LAW8950 W OLYMPIC BLVD STE 382BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211-3565UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded DVDs, high definition DVDs, optical video discs and compact discs featuring documentaries in the field of self-improvement, self-help, personal growth, inspiration, personal relationships, health and wellness, and spirituality; computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, electronic tablets, for supplying, pre-recorded messages, text messages, emails, photographic images, video and general information in the field of self-improvement, self-help, personal growth, inspiration, personal relationships, health and wellness and spirituality; Prerecorded compact discs featuring spoken word in the field of self-improvement, self-help, personal growth, inspiration, personal relationships, health and wellness and spiritualityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 6, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 1, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 12, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2016AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 9, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2016IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 9, 2016AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Feb 9, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2016AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 15, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 14, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2016EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 14, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 14, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 14, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance