USPTO serial 86378552
VENI, VIDI, VICI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENI, VIDI, VICI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and firmware for games of chance on any computerized platform, including slot machines, and video lottery terminals; Downloadable software and computer programs for playing casino games, slot games, mobile games, lottery games, online wagering games and online electronic games; Downloadable electronic game programs and software | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable computer software and firmware for games of chance on any computerized platform | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IGT CANADA SOLUTIONS ULC
- Other trademarks owned by GTECH Canada ULC
- Other trademarks owned by IGT CANADA SOLUTIONS ULC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VENI, VIDI, VICI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |