USPTO serial 86380157
SLIM BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLIM BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Hill
RICHARD L. HILL Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C.3301 North Thanksgiving Way, Suite 400Lehi, UT 84043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Exercise machines, exercise equipment and gear, namely, weights and weight lifting machines, manually operated exercise equipment, and treadmills; bags specially adapted for sports equipment and gear; athletic equipment and gear, namely, sport balls; basketball equipment, namely, basketballs, basketball hoops, basketball nets; volleyball equipment, namely, volleyball nets, volleyballs; football equipment, namely, footballs, football gloves, football pads; soccer equipment, namely, soccer balls, soccer goals; table tennis equipment, namely, table tennis balls, table tennis nets, table tennis paddles; tennis equipment, namely, tennis balls, tennis nets, tennis rackets; golf equipment, namely, golf clubs, golf balls, golf bags; boxing equipment, namely, boxing gloves, boxing bags; karate equipment, namely, karate kick pads, karate headgear guards; hockey equipment, namely, ice skates, hockey sticks; lacrosse equipment, namely, lacrosse sticks; skating equipment, namely, skating boots with skates attached, ice skate guards, inline roller skates; skateboard equipment, namely, skateboards, skateboard decks; surfing equipment, namely, surfboards, surfboard wax; snow board equipment, namely, snowboards, snowboard wax; snow ski equipment, namely, skis, ski poles, ski bags; water ski equipment, namely, water skis; swimming equipment, namely, swimming boards, swimming floats; scuba equipment, namely, scuba fins, scuba goggles, scuba masks, scuba flippers, scuba gloves; fishing equipment, namely, fishing rods, fishing lures; hunting equipment, namely, animal hunting decoys, field blinds used in hunting; yoga equipment, namely, yoga mats; toy flying discs, kites; amusement game machines; arcade games; arcade video game machines; action figures, radio controlled toys and radio-controlled toy vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |