USPTO serial 86381252
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip A. Jones
PHILIP A. JONES BRINKS GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610-0395UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Cloud computing services in the nature of data management services for others, namely, data processing services, compiling and analyzing data for business purposes, business data analysis, systemization of data in computer databases relating to data processors, memory devices, operating software, data storage units and software for managing and controlling data used in storage networks and intelligent storage systems capable of network communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic data exchange services, namely, exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunications networks, electronic exchange of medical records access a nationwide health information network, providing in-home PBX services; communication services between data banks, namely, communications via fiber optic networks, data communication via electronic mail; communication services for the electronic transmission of data; communication services for the exchange of data in electronic form, namely, electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunications networks, electronic data interchange, electronic data transmission; advisory services relating to all of the foregoing telecommunications services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use on hosted cloud computing services and hosted third party products, namely, non-downloadable software for use in data backup, encrypted file transfer, hosted email, document backup, producing and managing documents; computer services, namely, hosted management of cloud computing systems and applications for others; non-downloadable computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying cloud computing infrastructure services, namely, providing non-downloadable software for the administration of public cloud computing IT systems, non-downloadable software for the management of private cloud computing application systems; installation, configuration, and maintenance of computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying cloud computing infrastructure services; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, providing software for database management for business purposes; technical consulting services in the field of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, implementation of internet technology and services related to virtual infrastructure, electronic storage and networking; managed information technology services and operations for others, namely, IT project management, remote management of IT systems, on-site management of IT systems, computer project management of virtual infrastructure, networking and electronic storage services; creation, management and delivery of computer application, electronic data storage and information technology services via the internet and web/intranet/phone/mobile networks, namely, IT integration services, remote management of software applications for others, IT consulting services; professional cloud computing consultation services; technical support services related to all of the foregoing, namely, troubleshooting software problems; cloud computing services in the nature of data management services, namely, on-line electronic data storage services for others connecting with MFP (Multi-functional copying machines) | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |