Drawing for IPAT

USPTO serial 86381311

IPAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jun-Hwa Jeong

JUN-HWA JEONG RABIN & BERDO, P.C.1101 14TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5633UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Semiconductor manufacturing machines, namely, ion implanters for semiconductors and thermal processors for semiconductors; semiconductor wafer cleaning machines; dry etching machines for semiconductors; lithography printing machines for semiconductors; photo resist coating machines for semiconductors; plasma etching machines; plasma sputtering machinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 8, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 24, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 24, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 4, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 4, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 26, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 22, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 22, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 25, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 2, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance