USPTO serial 86381350
GREEN BEAUTY BLISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN BEAUTY BLISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Syracuse, NY
Syracuse, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Wasco
MICHAEL J WASCO PAUL FRANK + COLLINS PC1 CHURCH STBURLINGTON, VT 05402-1307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Body waxing services; facial treatment services, namely, light therapy and non-chemical peels; airbrush skin tanning services for humans for cosmetic purposes; in-person make-up consultation and application services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |