USPTO serial 86381689
XTREME SPORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XTREME SPORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vasant Vihar New Delhi, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Burlingame
ROBERT B BURLINGAME PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 2824SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles; two-wheeled motor vehicles; motorcycles; handlebars; motorcycle seats; seat coverings for vehicles; direction signals and direction signal warning alarms for vehicles; vehicle parts, namely, sun visors and windshield visors; fenders for vehicles; inner tubes and tires; tubeless tires for vehicles; patches for vehicle tires and inner tubes; weld patches for use with vehicles; valves for vehicle tires; rear view mirrors; side view mirrors; vehicle parts, namely, tire chains; saddles for motorcycles; vehicle tire inflating pumps; burglar alarms for vehicles; anti-theft devices for vehicles; horns for vehicles; chassis for motor vehicles; chains for motor vehicles; axle journals; axles for vehicles; brakes for vehicles; brake linings, segments and shoes for vehicles; caps for vehicle gas tanks; casings for pneumatic tires; motor vehicle pedal accessories, namely, cleats; spoke clips for wheels; clutches for land vehicles; driving chains and motors for land vehicles; elevating tailgates for land vehicles; luggage carriers for vehicles; engines for land vehicles; motors for two-wheeled land vehicles; gearboxes; mudguards; propulsion mechanisms for land vehicles; repair outfits in the nature of kits for repairing inner tubes, primarily comprised of patches; rims for vehicles wheels; shock absorbers for two-wheeled vehicles; shock absorbing springs for vehicles; brake shoes for vehicles; spikes for tires; anti-skid studs for vehicle tires; suspension springs for two-wheeled land vehicles; vehicle covers for two-wheeled vehicles; saddle covers for motorcycles; transmissions for land vehicles; vehicle wheels; wheel spokes for two-wheeled land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, maintenance, installation and servicing of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |