USPTO serial 86381692
SPLENDOR PRO CLASSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPLENDOR PRO CLASSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vasant Vihar New Delhi, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Burlingame
ROBERT B BURLINGAME PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 2824SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles; two-wheeled motor vehicles; motorcycles; handlebars, motorcycle seats, seat coverings, direction signals and direction signal warning alarms, vehicle parts, namely, sun visors and windshield visors, fenders, inner tubes and tires, tubeless tires, patches for vehicle tires and inner tubes, weld patches, valves for vehicle tires, rear view mirrors, side view mirrors, vehicle parts, namely, tire chains, saddles for motorcycles, vehicle tire inflating pumps, burglar alarms, anti-theft devices, horns, chassis, chains, axle journals, axles, brakes, brake linings, segments and shoes, caps for vehicle gas tanks, casings for pneumatic tires, motor vehicle pedal accessories, namely, cleats, spoke clips for wheels, clutches, driving chains and motors, elevating tailgates, luggage carriers, engines, motors for two-wheeled land vehicles, gearboxes, mudguards, propulsion mechanisms, repair outfits in the nature of kits for repairing inner tubes, primarily comprised of patches, rims for vehicles wheels, shock absorbers for two-wheeled vehicles, shock absorbing springs, brake shoes, spikes for tires, anti-skid studs for vehicle tires, suspension springs for two-wheeled land vehicles, vehicle covers for two-wheeled vehicles, saddle covers for motorcycles, transmissions, vehicle wheels, wheel spokes for two-wheeled land vehicles, all of the foregoing for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, maintenance, installation and servicing of vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |