USPTO serial 86383139
MEDIAMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIAMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Veldhuis-Kroeze
PETER J IMS WESTMAN CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER PA900 2ND AVE SSUITE 1400MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3244Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HIGH SPEED DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PREMISE TERMINATION MODULES FOR CONNECTING WIRE, CABLE AND WIRELESS NETWORK DIGITAL DATA AND VOICE INPUTS TO WIRE, CABLE AND WIRELESS PREMISE NETWORKS DIGITAL DATA AND VOICE OUTLETS EXCLUDING CABLES; PREMISE HIGH SPEED DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURES, NAMELY, PREMISE WIRING PANELS AND PANEL COVERS FOR WIRE, CABLE AND WIRELESS NETWORKS EXCLUDING CABLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |