USPTO serial 86389114
PULSEPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2016
- Examiner
- BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PULSEPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Owner
Alliance Pulse Processors Inc.
Regina SASKATCHEWAN, CA
Alliance Pulse Processors Inc.
Regina SASKATCHEWAN, CA
Alliance Pulse Processors Inc.
Regina SASKATCHEWAN, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph S. Presta
Joseph S. Presta NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N. Glebe Rd.11th FloorARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed pulses for human consumption, namely, lentils, peas, beans, faba beans and chickpeas packaged in wet or dry form; processed pulses for human consumption, namely, lentils, peas, beans, faba beans and chickpeas packaged for retail, commercial, food service or wholesale distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flour made from cereal or pulse crop feed stocks; Cereal and pulse crop fractions for human consumption, namely, protein, starch and bran fractions extracted from cereal and pulse crop feed stocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Cereal and pulse crop fractions for animal feed, namely, protein, starch and bran fractions extracted from cereal and pulse crop feed stocks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Pulse Processors Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Pulse Processors Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Alliance Pulse Processors Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named PULSEPLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |