USPTO serial 86397097
ZIPSCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 27, 2017
- Examiner
- DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ZIPSCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carmelo Joseph Licciardi Di Stefano
Broadmeadows VIC, AU
Other trademarks owned by Carmelo Joseph Licciardi Di Stefano
BROADMEADOWS, VIC, AU
BROADMEADOWS VIC, AU
BROADMEADOWS VIC, AU
BROADMEADOWS VIC, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick H. Colen
Frederick H. Colen The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | [ Partitions, namely, non-metal partitions for buildings; ] panels, namely, non-metal curtain walls; screens, namely, non-metal window screens and non-metal wind protection screens for protecting large openings such as alfresco areas, windows, entry ways, garages and balconies; outdoor blinds, not of metal or textile; [ outdoor roll-up blinds, not of metal or textile; ] outdoor blackout blinds other than of metal or textile; [ outdoor horizontal slatted blinds, not of metal or textile; non-metallic outdoor slatted shutters; slatted outdoor non-metallic thermal blinds; ] outdoor blinds, not of metal and not of textile; outdoor polyvinyl chloride blinds; outdoor window roller shades of plastic; outdoor blinds, not of metal or textile in the nature of sun screens; [ outdoor vertical blinds of nonmetallic materials; ] outdoor window blinds not of metal or textile [ ; non-metallic building materials, namely, non-metal window casements, non-metal windows and non-metal storm windows; nonmetallic rigid pipes for building; non-metal outdoor pleated window shades; outdoor roller window shades of textile; parts and accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, non-metal parts for buildings, namely, adjusters for adjusting the height of outdoor blinds, not of metal and not of textile ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Outdoor blackout blinds of textile; [ outdoor horizontal slatted blinds, of textile; ] outdoor blinds of textile; outdoor blinds of textile in the nature of sun screens; outdoor window blinds of textile; roller screens in the nature of outdoor blinds of textile [ ; ropes, string and awnings not included in other classes; parts and accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, venetian blind tapes ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | [ Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes, namely, curtain loops of textile and curtain tie backs in the nature of textile curtain holders; curtains and window coverings in this class, namely, curtains, window curtains, draperies and sheers; textile materials being textile fabrics and cloth textiles for use in the manufacture of blinds ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carmelo Joseph Licciardi Di Stefano
- Other trademarks owned by ROLLEASE ACMEDA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by ACMEDA PTY LTD ACN
- Other trademarks owned by ACMEDA PTY LTD ACN
- Other trademarks owned by ACMEDA PTY LTD ACN
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ZIPSCREEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| May 16, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 1, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | RG1B | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REQUEST TO DELETE 1(B) FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |