USPTO serial 86400230
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David I. Greenbaum
DAVID I. GREENBAUM DAY PITNEY LLP7 TIMES SQ FL 20NEW YORK, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Rubber lined metal pipes for slurry transportation; common metals and their alloys; metal building materials, namely, iron bars and steel bars; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery and small items of metal hardware, namely, screws, cotter pins; pipes and tubes of metal; metal safes; metal ores; fluid storage bunkers, non-mechanical hoppers and bins of metal; chutes of metal for moving building materials and construction waste | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines, namely, hoppers for slurry transportation, separating minerals and ores, and material transportation; machine parts, namely, chutes, pulleys, conveyer belts, and screens; machines, namely, washing drums for cleaning ores and minerals, grinding machines, cyclone coolant purifying machines; cyclone machines for particle collection in grinding operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Rubber lining for machines, grinding mills, concrete mixers and other goods for wear resistant purposes; rubber sheets and molded rubber products, namely, polyurethane screens for ore and mineral separators, rubber slurry handling hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building construction specific to the mining industry; repair of machines and machine parts specific to the mining industry; installation services specific to machines and machine parts used in the mining industry, namely, installation of conveyor belts, pulleys, screens, washing drums for cleaning ores and minerals, rubber lined metal pipes for slurry transportation, hydro cyclones, and grinding machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of metal industrial machines and machine parts specific to the mining industry; engineering design specific to the machines and machine parts in the mining industry; industrial engineering design services for metal industrial machines and machine parts specific to the mining industry; mechanical engineering design services for metal industrial machines and machine parts specific to the mining industry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |