USPTO serial 86409140
KORAMZI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KORAMZI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farhad Novian
FARHAD NOVIAN NOVIAN & NOVIAN LLP1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1201LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Portable electric fans; electric space heaters; electric toasters and electric toaster ovens; electric indoor grills; barbecues; electric slow cookers; electric rice cookers; pizza cooking oven and convection ovens; electric roasting apparatus, namely, roasters powered by propane gas; microwave ovens; electric kettles; electric coffee machines; electric espresso machines; electric hot pots; electric omelet makers; electric waffle makers; electric griddles; electric deep fryers; electric stoves; portable fireplaces; lighting consisting of incandescent and LED light bulbs; electric lamps; electric candles; electric skillets; electric appliances for making yoghurt; refrigerators; freezers; electric space heaters; ice machines; wine coolers, namely, refrigerated cabinets containing racks for wine bottles and storage shelves; water coolers; electric hand drying machines and apparatus for washrooms; hair dryers; air extractor hoods for kitchens; ventilation hoods; laundry drying machines; tanning beds; apparatus for air treating and air conditioning, namely, air cooling apparatus and air conditioning apparatus; air purifying apparatus and air purifying machines; air conditioning apparatus and air conditioning machines for industrial purposes machines; electric fans; flashlights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2016 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |