USPTO serial 86412222
HIP HOP SUSPENDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4990542Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 28, 2016
- Examiner
- HISER, CHARLES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIP HOP SUSPENDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
ALEX PATEL PATEL & ALMEIDA, P.C.16830 VENTURA BLVDSUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Suspenders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 10, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 23, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |